From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun 30 08:46:19 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C176737B401
	for <threads@freebsd.org>; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 08:46:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from web80511.mail.yahoo.com (web80511.mail.yahoo.com
	[66.218.79.81])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F96F43FDF
	for <threads@freebsd.org>; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 08:46:19 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from xiongjinshan@yahoo.com)
Message-ID: <20030630154618.93274.qmail@web80511.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [211.144.73.27] by web80511.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP;
	Mon, 30 Jun 2003 08:46:18 PDT
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 08:46:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: xiong jinshan <xiongjinshan@yahoo.com>
To: deischen@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10306300936460.22873-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
cc: threads@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: About the kse signal process
X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD <freebsd-threads.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-threads>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-threads@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 15:46:20 -0000


--- Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, xiong jinshan wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >   I am wondering that the following piece of code
> > can't work with the unix semantics. I tested it
> with
> > 5.1 release and i386 arch. By unix sementics, if I
> > send the SIGALRM to this running programme, it
> should
> > be received by the thr_func() only, and print a
> prompt
> > msg on the console.
> 
> Yes, only thr_func() should receive the alarm.
This is the issue. Nothing printed on the console when
I sent the signal SIGALRM, it meant that none of the
thread received this signal.

> 
> > 
> > Reguards,
> > JinShan
> > 
> > Ps: c code:
> > 
> > /* vi: set ts=4 sw=4 expandtab: */
> > #include <stdio.h>
> > #include <signal.h>
> > #include <pthread.h>
> > 
> > void sigalrm_handler(int signo)
> > {
> >     if(signo != SIGALRM)
> >         abort();
> > 
> >     printf("Received sig alarm!\n");
> >     return;
> > }
> > 
> > void thr_func(void)
> > {
> >     sigset_t mask;
> >     struct sigaction sa;
> > 
> >     sigemptyset(&mask);
> >     sigaddset(&mask, SIGALRM);
> >     pthread_sigmask(SIG_UNBLOCK, &mask, NULL);
> > 
> >     memset(&sa, 0, sizeof(struct sigaction));
> >     sa.sa_handler = sigalrm_handler;
> >     sigaction(SIGALRM, &sa, NULL);
> > 
> >     while(1);
> > }
> > 
> > main()
> > {
> >     int err;
> >     pthread_t pth;
> >     sigset_t mask;
> > 
> >     sigfillset(&mask);
> >     sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, &mask, NULL);
> > 
> >     err = pthread_create(&pth, NULL, thr_func,
> NULL);
> >     if(err < 0) {
> >         perror("pthread_create!\n");
> >         return -1;
> >     }
> > 
> >     while(1);
> 
> -- 
> Dan Eischen
> 


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com