From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 24 09:49:18 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from green.bikeshed.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23BB016A4CF; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 09:49:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from green.bikeshed.org (green@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by green.bikeshed.org (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAOHnHnc013631; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 12:49:17 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from green@green.bikeshed.org) Received: from localhost (green@localhost)hAOHnHrW013628; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 12:49:17 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200311241749.hAOHnHrW013628@green.bikeshed.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4 To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" In-Reply-To: Message from "Jacques A. Vidrine" <20031124173656.GA27782@madman.celabo.org> From: "Brian F. Feldman" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 12:49:17 -0500 Sender: green@green.bikeshed.org cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: Pav Lucistnik cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/print/cups-lpr Makefile pkg-deinstall pkg-install pkg-message X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 17:49:18 -0000 "Jacques A. Vidrine" wrote: > On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 05:20:13PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > On (2003/11/21 16:18), Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > > > Modified files: > > > print/cups-lpr Makefile > > > Added files: > > > print/cups-lpr pkg-deinstall pkg-install pkg-message > > > Log: > > > - Move lpr binaries in base away, so cups binaries in /usr/local/bin > > > get picked. > > > - Move them back on deinstall. > > > > This is only a partial solution; the next "make world" will blow away > > these binaries. > > > > Also, if I'm using the binary updater package, it'll have a cow on the > > next lpr update. > > > > I really think you should be leaving this up to the sysadmin, > > documenting the list of files that should be removed, and recommending > > the use of NO_LPR=yes in /etc/make.conf. > > Seconded, this is a *horrible* thing to do. Please back this out. > Ports should not mess with the base system unless the administrator > *specifically* asks for it. A knob in the style of *_OVERWRITE_BASE > is probably appropriate. A better solution is having a separate CUPS prefix for lpr which can be added to an individual's path based on his or her preferences. -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \'[ FreeBSD ]''''''''''\ <> green@FreeBSD.org \ The Power to Serve! \ Opinions expressed are my own. \,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,\