From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Jan 24 03:53:02 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62789A8D08A for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 03:53:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cenzatti@hush.com) Received: from smtp2.hushmail.com (smtp2a.hushmail.com [65.39.178.237]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.hushmail.com", Issuer "smtp.hushmail.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 409C4151F for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 03:53:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cenzatti@hush.com) Received: from smtp2.hushmail.com (smtp2a.hushmail.com [65.39.178.237]) by smtp2.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C0E57A0420 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 03:53:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=hush.com; h=date:to:subject:from; s=hush; bh=YVJm0lMOwUJkGAHWsubPDSbYZdOE3i3C3pjcJTMHB9c=; b=gTUcVA8iiKOsYXN6w623KbWyFDkEivWuSP9FD0TJEmuS7wZLv6DliPkRmFHOzRXsfTu07eDGz/ean6krs1gS3+B9BkRmxhAh7wfiQ4fpFlrnDMgHS7uD7fC15AFwXagCEttxqqX5riElRwQjAXJzcOL3hAHH5yS1mqSo7+ATdW3n7gaiy4uMYkSZ4cDVUQxH5E2ls9KeKt04ZhshlE55S56r0iQcud4Jp+1loEfv1xvyJyH5MQsg9qKARzWqY9oZDeTHZx4a5gX7cEB9H8Sd94Bc7vj/5LSHPpXP3CvrlfoI2QOppf+cN8P8V8rJLc4nR4RG0lhA71BCqVkzP6R5ww== Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w5.hushmail.com [65.39.178.80]) by smtp2.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 03:53:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 3E533A0126; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 03:53:00 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 01:52:59 -0200 To: "Adrian Chadd" , "Luigi Rizzo" Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, "Navdeep Parhar" Subject: Re: solved: Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX From: "Marcus Cenzatti" In-Reply-To: References: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: <20160124035300.3E533A0126@smtp.hushmail.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 03:53:02 -0000 On 1/24/2016 at 1:20 AM, "Adrian Chadd" wrote: > >[snip] > >You should be able to run with cxl0 down but ncxl0 up. If that >doesn't >work then it's a bug. It worked when I last tried 40g bridging >(about >5 months ago.) > >Try that manually - ifconfig cxl0 down; ifconfig ncxl0 up > > tried, ncxl really won't up while cxl is down, here you are: chelsio# ifconfig cxl0 down chelsio# ifconfig ncxl0 up chelsio# ifconfig cxl0 cxl0: flags=8802 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=ec00bb ether 00:07:43:33:8d:c0 nd6 options=29 media: Ethernet 10Gbase-SR status: no carrier chelsio# ifconfig ncxl0 ncxl0: flags=28943 metric 0 mtu 1500 ether 00:07:43:33:8d:c1 inet 172.16.0.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 172.16.0.255 nd6 options=29 media: Ethernet 10Gbase-SR status: no carrier chelsio# ifconfig ncxl0 up (insisted) chelsio# ifconfig cxl0 cxl0: flags=8802 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=ec00bb ether 00:07:43:33:8d:c0 nd6 options=29 media: Ethernet 10Gbase-SR status: no carrier chelsio# ifconfig ncxl0 ncxl0: flags=28943 metric 0 mtu 1500 ether 00:07:43:33:8d:c1 inet 172.16.0.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 172.16.0.255 nd6 options=29 media: Ethernet 10Gbase-SR status: no carrier chelsio# ifconfig cxl0 up chelsio# ifconfig cxl0 cxl0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=ec00bb ether 00:07:43:33:8d:c0 nd6 options=29 media: Ethernet 10Gbase-SR status: active chelsio# ifconfig ncxl0 ncxl0: flags=28943 metric 0 mtu 1500 ether 00:07:43:33:8d:c1 inet 172.16.0.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 172.16.0.255 nd6 options=29 media: Ethernet 10Gbase-SR status: active chelsio#