Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 01:01:50 -0800 From: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@osd.bsdi.com> To: danfe@inet.ssc.nsu.ru Cc: doconnor@gsoft.com.au, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, thierry@herbelot.com Subject: Re: Porting NVidia linux kernel modules to FreeBSD Message-ID: <20010312010150Q.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10103120946590.24090-100000@inet.ssc.nsu.ru> References: <XFMail.010312140014.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <Pine.LNX.4.10.10103120946590.24090-100000@inet.ssc.nsu.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Guys, I'm testing the *currently available* bits, I'm not testing anything in 4.0.x we don't actually support right now (erm, how would I?) and all I'm really doing is verifying that the GLX extention is provided in both cases and that the test application is linked against the appropriate glx-aware OpenGL library. More than that, I cannot say since I haven't actually grubbed through the 4.0.2 bits to see how Matrox or Nvidia-aware they are, the G400 and TNT2 being my two test cards (I played with a Voodoo3 card for awhile but it sucked so badly under both that I stopped bothering with it). However, I think Alexey sounds like the kind of guy who shouldn't take my results as indicative of anything but instead try his own comparison tests. I don't mean that sarcastically but sincerely - having independent testing will almost certainly catch anything I missed. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010312010150Q.jkh>