Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 10:18:55 -0400 From: Maxim Khitrov <max@mxcrypt.com> To: Mark Felder <feld@feld.me> Cc: Bas Smeelen <b.smeelen@ose.nl>, Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Adam Strohl <adams-freebsd@ateamsystems.com> Subject: Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO Message-ID: <CAJcQMWe0GexCKGcLmr3Y03OvHQ2G6m%2BkfRaF_=WqvqhDcybu1A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20121103091056.00004eb9@unknown> References: <5093F934.7050306@ose.nl> <5093FD3D.3080201@ateamsystems.com> <Pine.GSO.4.64.1211021742410.15219@sea.ntplx.net> <50944597.9090709@ose.nl> <20121103091056.00004eb9@unknown>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Mark Felder <feld@feld.me> wrote: > On Fri, 2 Nov 2012 23:13:43 +0100 > Bas Smeelen <b.smeelen@ose.nl> wrote: > >> I have submitted a PR with patch, see how it goes >> Cheers > > Why aren't we patching the dump utility to error/exit saying it's not compatible with SUJ at this time? Update the descriptions in the installer, but leave SUJ as default and patch dump. If I understood Mateusz correctly, r230725 already took care of the panic, so there is no need to modify dump. That, however, still doesn't solve all problems: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2012-November/246069.html - Max
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJcQMWe0GexCKGcLmr3Y03OvHQ2G6m%2BkfRaF_=WqvqhDcybu1A>