From owner-freebsd-current Tue May 30 09:17:59 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id JAA00941 for current-outgoing; Tue, 30 May 1995 09:17:59 -0700 Received: from aries.ai.net (ai.net [198.69.35.206]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id JAA00925 for ; Tue, 30 May 1995 09:17:55 -0700 Received: (from nc@localhost) by aries.ai.net (8.6.11/8.6.12) id MAA17126; Tue, 30 May 1995 12:14:28 -0400 Date: Tue, 30 May 1995 12:14:28 -0400 (EDT) From: Network Coordinator To: "Rodney W. Grimes" cc: Mike Pritchard , wsantee@wsantee.oz.net, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: freebsd-* mailing lists (Was Re: SUP server down?) In-Reply-To: <199505300915.CAA03249@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > freefall:cvswork {111} mailstats > Statistics from Sat May 27 04:19:52 1995 > M msgsfr bytes_from msgsto bytes_to Mailer > 0 0 0K 1026 2285K prog > 1 0 0K 394 875K *file* > 3 2703 6324K 3653 7964K local > 4 1227 3585K 263175 531621K smtp > ======================================== > T 3930 9909K 268248 542745K > freefall:cvswork {112} > > I see turn around times on my messages well under 10 minutes in most > cases, if your seeing 8 hours you probably have a DNS or route problem > that is causing your mail to get defered :-(. That and I am at the > top of the lists, and your probably quite far down on them depending > on when you joined the list. > I must fit in the same category in terms of being far down the lists. However, mail directly TO majordomo [stat requests, etc] come back almost INSTANTLY. [like I hit send, hit index, and have a reply] so I think freefall definitely has enough CPU/bandwidth free to deal with that. I think sendmail might not exactly rush to send bulk priority mail out though. -Jerry.