Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 10 Aug 2019 21:42:35 +0200
From:      Michael Osipov <1983-01-06@gmx.net>
To:        Greg Lewis <glewis@eyesbeyond.com>
Cc:        java@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: RFC: Future of java/openjdk6 and java/openjdk7
Message-ID:  <d8036483-9b1f-c54b-6e7d-4821c4a93afd@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <20190810193529.GA38493@misty.eyesbeyond.com>
References:  <20190802014149.GA59118@misty.eyesbeyond.com> <935ee70b-0f6e-1813-25c3-ced836143e32@gmx.net> <20190810183901.GA76800@misty.eyesbeyond.com> <22887160-4c94-9907-84f3-23fff562c239@gmx.net> <20190810193529.GA38493@misty.eyesbeyond.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 2019-08-10 um 21:35 schrieb Greg Lewis:
> On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 08:52:26PM +0200, Michael Osipov wrote:
>> Am 2019-08-10 um 20:39 schrieb Greg Lewis:
>>> On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 08:07:39AM +0200, Michael Osipov wrote:
>>>> Am 2019-08-02 um 03:41 schrieb Greg Lewis:
>>>>> Oracle ended official releases of JDK 7 in April of 2015, and JDK 6 =
even
>>>>> earlier.  In the FreeBSD ports collection both java/openjdk6 and
>>>>> java/openjdk7 have fallen out of maintenance and are considerably be=
hind
>>>>> in terms of updates (which likely include fixes for security
>>>>> vulnerabilities).  In addition, openjdk6 will soon become unbuildabl=
e in
>>>>> FreeBSD 12-STABLE based on
>>>>>
>>>>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D234792
>>>>>
>>>>> With OpenJDK 8 having been the default JDK for a number of years now=
,
>>>>> OpenJDK 11 and 12 both being available (and soon 13) I would suggest
>>>>> that both openjdk6 and openjdk7 be removed, along with any ports
>>>>> depending explicitly on them(*) which are unable to be updated to us=
e a
>>>>> newer version.
>>>>
>>>> Being an Apache Maven PMC member and a happy FreeBSD user, we guarant=
ee
>>>> that the entire Maven stack runs on top of Java 7+, so I run all
>>>> integration tests for all components I change on a regular basis on
>>>> several BSD boxes (home, work) to test compat outside of the monotoni=
c
>>>> Windows/Linux world.
>>>>
>>>> Just because Oracle does not provide any binary packages for Java 7 i=
t
>>>> does not meean that it is not supported. There are a lot of vendors
>>>> still providing Java 7 packages, e.g, Azul Systems, RHEL, HPE for HP-=
UX
>>>> (Java SE 7 is supported till July 2022 and Java SE 8 is supported til=
l
>>>> March 2025) and likely others.
>>>
>>> Given this is the only response so far, I assume all are comfortable w=
ith
>>> removing openjdk6 and I'm going to go ahead with that once the ports t=
hat
>>> need upgrading have done so.
>>>
>>> With openjdk7, removing the port will not force you to remove the pack=
age
>>> from your system.  I still have some older JDK ports on my desktop eve=
n
>>> though they've been removed from the ports tree.  The problem with lea=
ving
>>> it in the tree is that it has security vulnerabilities with the curren=
t
>>> version and no one has volunteered to update it to the latest version.
>>>
>>> My question then is whether that would work.  You leave the port on yo=
ur
>>> machine and/or build a local package of it prior to removal.  That sho=
uld
>>> be sufficient to use it for the lifecycle of the current FreeBSD relea=
se
>>> and further without leaving a vulnerable port in the ports tree.
>>
>> Well, I am not a huge fan of this because I cannot reproduce the build
>> at any time -- making an OSS component virtually useless. I don't want
>> to be dependent on others to produce it. I have gone through this with
>> the "HP-UX Porting and Archive Centre" and abandoned all packages from
>> them because they never brought there changes upstream and I was not
>> really able to reproduce their builds.
>>
>> To make a long story short, if you want to cut OpenJDK 7, perform a
>> final update, announce the port as deprecated and remove it at some
>> point. That would be fair deal. OpenJDK 6 is obsolete.
>
> To reiterate, I am not planning on spending any time on openjdk7 since i=
t
> has been EoL for so long.

Where is this EOL? I see regular changes here:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u/




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d8036483-9b1f-c54b-6e7d-4821c4a93afd>