From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 14 17:31:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E65316A43A for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 17:31:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from saundersconsult@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com (bay115-f16.bay115.hotmail.com [65.54.250.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E88343D69 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 17:30:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from saundersconsult@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 09:30:38 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 65.54.250.200 by by115fd.bay115.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 17:30:36 GMT X-Originating-IP: [64.60.108.59] X-Originating-Email: [saundersconsult@hotmail.com] X-Sender: saundersconsult@hotmail.com From: "Shawn Saunders" To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 09:30:36 -0800 X-Priority: 1 Importance: High Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Mar 2006 17:30:38.0364 (UTC) FILETIME=[02723DC0:01C6478D] Subject: Redirect fec0 to physical NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 17:31:00 -0000 I have successfully used add_iface to bond two interfaces to fec0 (10/100's). I would like to now take fec0 and send it out a physical interface, but when I attempt to either add the fec0 interface, or substitute a real interface and use add_iface of two real interfaces to a third real interface, it says that the "Function is not implemented". I am using FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p9. I don't need to use a virtual interface. My real goal is to take traffic from multiple incoming physical interfaces, and redirect them (agregate) out another physical interface. Even if there is traffic loss, that is not a problem. Just need to know if it can be done. If so, I can then work on the bandwidth limitations.