From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 16:38:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F5DE16A4CE; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 16:38:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pittgoth.com (14.zlnp1.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.149.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD2143D39; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 16:38:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (64-144-75-100.client.dsl.net [64.144.75.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by pittgoth.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iB6Gc2ag088781 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 6 Dec 2004 11:38:03 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 11:38:09 -0500 From: Tom Rhodes To: Ceri Davies Message-ID: <20041206113809.1f4fd261@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20041206163322.GH513@submonkey.net> References: <200412042304.iB4N488e000350@repoman.freebsd.org> <20041206115045.GB513@submonkey.net> <20041206162939.GB78078@freebsdmall.com> <20041206112630.1b8b9695@localhost> <20041206163322.GH513@submonkey.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12b (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Murray Stokely cc: Murray Stokely cc: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en/docproj current.sgml X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 16:38:05 -0000 On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 16:33:22 +0000 Ceri Davies wrote: > On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 11:26:30AM -0500, Tom Rhodes wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 08:29:39 -0800 > > Murray Stokely wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 11:50:45AM +0000, Ceri Davies wrote: > > > > Hmm. Does that actually buy us anything in the way of maintainability? > > > > > > > > > I wasn't prepared to make all

's on our site show up in maroon, > > > although I probably should have rather than just added the 'red' > > > classname. > > > > > > I think the intention is for all of them to be maroon, and it's just > > > an oversight when they show up in default black. We probably should > > > remove the class=red from this file, and just make all the h3's show > > > up in maroon. > > > > Perhaps we should sit down and come up with a valid color scheme > > which we could all agree on? > > I don't mind. I've started using blue in my own stuff (e.g. > http://shrike.submonkey.net/~ceri/doc/articles/dns-primer/) which I > think looks nicer than red, but that's a real bikeshed for now. > > The real thing to get sorted is to get everything factored out into a > stylesheet somewhere, and then we can come up with individual > stylesheets and argue about them when we have a chance of making them > work properly. Very true, I'll shut up on the issue now as I really don't care much whether the color is red, blue, black, green, etc. :) -- Tom Rhodes