From owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 25 14:49:41 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC6AA7D9 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 14:49:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1bon0137.outbound.protection.outlook.com [157.56.111.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EF6E607 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 14:49:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.0.21] (73.5.142.244) by DM2PR0301MB0845.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.215.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.26.15; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 14:35:19 +0000 Message-ID: <547493A0.70001@my.hennepintech.edu> Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 08:35:12 -0600 From: Andrew Berg User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Subject: Re: [SOLVED] multimedia/x264 build failure, linker error References: <2002873.iA6NuqLZfy@amd.asgard.uk> <2718486.HeFL0Qyace@amd.asgard.uk> <24936541.dtFOE5QvMi@amd.asgard.uk> <20141124223344.GA9356@pcjas.obspm.fr> <20141125142631.GA24514@in-addr.com> In-Reply-To: <20141125142631.GA24514@in-addr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [73.5.142.244] X-ClientProxiedBy: BL2PR08CA0025.namprd08.prod.outlook.com (10.255.170.143) To DM2PR0301MB0845.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.215.143) X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:; X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DM2PR0301MB0845; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DM2PR0301MB0845; X-Forefront-PRVS: 040655413E X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(6049001)(51704005)(24454002)(199003)(189002)(75432002)(42186005)(120916001)(50986999)(87976001)(83506001)(46102003)(122386002)(40100003)(31966008)(99396003)(92726001)(92566001)(97736003)(23676002)(88552001)(101416001)(102836001)(86362001)(33656002)(110136001)(50466002)(93886004)(105586002)(106356001)(20776003)(47776003)(64706001)(4396001)(65806001)(66066001)(65956001)(95666004)(65816999)(54356999)(76176999)(89122001)(107046002)(107886001)(2351001)(21056001)(77156002)(77096003)(62966003)(450100001)(89472002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DM2PR0301MB0845; H:[10.0.0.21]; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:0; MX:1; LANG:en; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DM2PR0301MB0845; X-OriginatorOrg: my.hennepintech.edu X-BeenThere: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Multimedia discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 14:49:41 -0000 On 2014.11.25 08:26, Gary Palmer wrote: > Since I assume most of the packages that depend on the old x264-0.136.2358_4 > depend on the library rather than the CLI command, is there any harm in > doing > > portmaster -o multimedia/libx264 x264-0.136.2358_4 > > instead? That way the dependancies are kept (mostly) correct Don't do that. The dependency change has been properly handled, and those ports know to use multimedia/libx264.