From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 18 10:38:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F59B16A4DD; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 10:38:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38C2E43D55; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 10:38:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DDDC1A4DCC; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 03:38:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 22EB051744; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 06:38:54 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 06:38:54 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Andrew Pantyukhin Message-ID: <20060818103853.GA94501@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060816123335.GA42090@underworld.novel.ru> <20060816172835.GA29719@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060817053955.GD62148@underworld.novel.ru> <20060817124739.GA3643@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060818064537.GA78016@underworld.novel.ru> <20060818093758.GA92685@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Roman Bogorodskiy , Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: ports tree tagging again X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 10:38:55 -0000 --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:21:38PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > When/if we get a new VCS, where branching is not as painful > as it is now, I expect it to be used extensively by developers. >=20 > Projects can be then brought back into our main repo from > marcuscom, p4 and other local repos. We often work on some > things together and/or from multiple locations. It feels so > awkward to send patches in email attachments or uploading > them somewhere. >=20 > Moreover, with a new VCS, I expect a possibility for maintainers > to gain commit rights to some separate branches. Committers > may then easily review and merge changes to the trunk. Note to readers: please avoid the temptation to now follow up and discuss the merits of which VCS is best. Kris --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFE5Zi9Wry0BWjoQKURAmMWAJ0Xqg9wnxVuqvhadQQKUd2ZCMa4yACfZjK7 el7i3brWkBCk2M+9Opq0so4= =PsIx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM--