From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Nov 7 14:10:41 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0837237B401 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 14:10:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.rpi.edu (mail.rpi.edu [128.113.22.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A7FF43E6E for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 14:10:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by mail.rpi.edu (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id gA7MAUHG101676; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 17:10:30 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20021107.115936.40770874.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20021107.115936.40770874.imp@bsdimp.com> Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 17:10:29 -0500 To: "M. Warner Losh" , arch@FreeBSD.ORG From: Garance A Drosihn Subject: Re: Simple patch to make __sF suck less on -stable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.3 (www dot roaringpenguin dot com slash mimedefang) Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 11:59 AM -0700 11/7/02, M. Warner Losh wrote: >http://people.freebsd.org/~imp/sf-patch > >This causes stable to generate __std{in,out,err}p references in >preference to __sF. If you rebuild with this patch, then you'll >not have __sF references in your libraries. Assuming this works, would it be useful to have this included in the "-security" branch(es)? -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message