From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri May  5 00:44:15 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id AAA15758
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 5 May 1995 00:44:15 -0700
Received: from caern.protocorp.com (d4.leonardo.net [198.147.97.68])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id AAA15750
          for <freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com>; Fri, 5 May 1995 00:44:11 -0700
Received: from caern.leonardo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by caern.protocorp.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) with ESMTP id AAA00490 for <freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com>; Fri, 5 May 1995 00:43:43 -0700
Message-Id: <199505050743.AAA00490@caern.protocorp.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.5.3 12/28/94
To: freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com
Subject: Re: slattach!!!!!!! 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 04 May 1995 12:20:31 MDT."
             <199505041820.MAA16185@trout.sri.MT.net> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Fri, 05 May 1995 00:43:42 -0700
From: "Mike O'Brien" <obrien@leonardo.net>
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

	I'm curious about this whole reconnection thing.  In all the
PPP cases I know, the providers do dynamic address assignment, which
means that if you use 'expect' to redial your provider, you have no
idea what your hosts new IP address and/or name are going to be.

	How do you people handle this problem?

Mike O'Brien