From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Oct 21 11:55:32 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 467591B5
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 11:55:32 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.27])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A753227F
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 11:55:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.44])
 by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE2B8207E7
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 07:55:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213])
 by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 21 Oct 2013 07:55:30 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:references
 :subject:date; s=smtpout; bh=RpZE4TWPLLqLbEfEms3yYutSrnI=; b=Wip
 /tbPhioUL0f5L4v/fWEzLo1VmbQTZLZHmjdGEth3jJHv/K+W1SYLnvHBIVmhNS1g
 HEqbNEVjXu0v6guLO3H+XQm/bH32idDjU3ng0Zd9Y/mHVlOki5cHyHRMD9IPidPw
 i25/d+aajQBAMg5l/76ZbhlzNahGa3WQsQ/l03Y0=
Received: by web3.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99)
 id CE3041054A7; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 07:55:30 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <1382356530.11468.36539641.1FE3B056@webmail.messagingengine.com>
X-Sasl-Enc: I9Qah4XQpe/7Y0wlSPiroDb4X+ikfkvbhijjJ5lqOvjq 1382356530
From: Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-0cc2f9cc
In-Reply-To: <4B6CC4DF-161C-4CA0-9B0E-F7D20AECE76E@lassitu.de>
References: <4B6CC4DF-161C-4CA0-9B0E-F7D20AECE76E@lassitu.de>
Subject: Re: Keep named going after upgrade to 10-stable
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 06:55:30 -0500
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 11:55:32 -0000

On Sun, Oct 20, 2013, at 7:33, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> 
> First, after make installworld, your 9-stable /usr/sbin/named is still
> there, so your current configuration will continue to work without issue.
> Only when you make delete-old will the old binaries be removed. In
> preparation for that:
> 

I suspect that /etc/rc.d/named not being removed by make-delete-old is
an accident, because it shouldn't exist if named isn't in base. The port
should be installing /usr/local/etc/rc.d/named...