From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Nov  7 07:26:07 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 707F616A4CE; Sun,  7 Nov 2004 07:26:07 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 36A2343D48; Sun,  7 Nov 2004 07:26:07 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from [192.160.235.2] (cs242746-26.austin.rr.com [24.27.46.26])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7DE40148DA; Sun,  7 Nov 2004 01:26:06 -0600 (CST)
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
Organization: Lonesome Dove Computing Services
To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org
Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 01:23:22 -0600
User-Agent: KMail/1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed;
  boundary="Boundary-00=_q1cjBd96JVSDjQY"
Message-Id: <200411070123.22843.linimon@lonesome.com>
cc: scottl@FreeBSD.org
cc: kensmith@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [patch] missing FreeBSD versions in Porter's Handbook
X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Documentation project <freebsd-doc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-doc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2004 07:26:07 -0000

--Boundary-00=_q1cjBd96JVSDjQY
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

There are a couple of missing versions.  One's easy, the other is
the problematic one where we had a version and then backed it out.
Worse, we seem to have reintroduced that number later.

I _think_ this patch is accurate but someone who understands what
happened will have to tell me so.


--Boundary-00=_q1cjBd96JVSDjQY
Content-Type: text/x-diff;
  charset="us-ascii";
  name="diff.out"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename="diff.out"

Index: book.sgml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/FreeBSD/dcvs/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.sgml,v
retrieving revision 1.490
diff -u -r1.490 book.sgml
--- book.sgml	4 Nov 2004 08:57:33 -0000	1.490
+++ book.sgml	7 Nov 2004 07:20:23 -0000
@@ -7376,6 +7376,20 @@
 		    <entry>5.3-RELEASE</entry>
 		    <entry>503000</entry>
 		  </row>
+
+		  <row>
+		    <entry>5.3 after addition of the struct inpcb
+		      argument to the pfil API.  (This was also
+		      erroneously used to indicate 5.3 after permanently
+		      enabling PFIL_HOOKS, but that was quickly backed out.)
+		    <entry>503001</entry>
+		  </row>
+
+		  <row>
+		    <entry>5.3-STABLE after branching for RELENG_5_3</entry>
+		    <entry>503100</entry>
+		  </row>
+
 		  <row>
 		    <entry>6.0-CURRENT</entry>
 		    <entry>600000</entry>

--Boundary-00=_q1cjBd96JVSDjQY--