From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 11 15:48:29 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B470C5EE; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:48:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomek.cedro@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qa0-f43.google.com (mail-qa0-f43.google.com [209.85.216.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58ECEA33; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:48:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id dx4so1228418qab.9 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 07:48:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=cjzHaUf9ELrVVemqL4f9uDHMc37oGbj3ZAVpWfKSjC8=; b=ZISnSDEPMw283I9lvTLq0o02AmGNvyiSHP9/Ygk97VQaCJMTywQnJ+vf54v7oHSvwz VrIJv2HSxivJJAF/mBx1Fg+ksAXnVlOtauBtvGH2VFSJKzn4Sc4F/d7Ev6yj0T0rrJmr 8fCk1/j7dziU7ir8PmA3L23y94dIr78HQCMfO946pOFEVZM3vavnr+A0HEseogaLlLPl WdEyclgsivCeZmrrXRtILLE7cNOgN66sxfrk7Ca7XuL5l+USSUkh+UCA/lKku8lIM5az fjf15VAss6kIuSgid0O8xzXVXu6+zTkXPsD6mdkAyDK212r/ANQ1IpPAiPv3hXZpuk7e JdpA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.229.177.14 with SMTP id bg14mr1328424qcb.51.1360597703144; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 07:48:23 -0800 (PST) Sender: tomek.cedro@gmail.com Received: by 10.49.71.204 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 07:48:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:48:22 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: qo3PzQOEmKBMiHilDclv-kpANjY Message-ID: Subject: Re: 9.1 AMD64 multitasking efficiency low From: CeDeROM To: =?UTF-8?Q?Bernhard_Fr=C3=B6hlich?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:48:29 -0000 On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Bernhard Fr=C3=B6hlich = wrote: > You can try to switch to emulators/virtualbox-ose-legacy which is > VirtualBox 4.1.x > just to rule out that this is a vbox regression. Just be sure to power > down the VMs > first. > It would be interesting to watch if the machine starts to swap when that = is all > running. Hello Bernhard, thank you for your hints, I can try with VBox 4.1, but first I will try to get rid of the Ext2 from my system. On another machine I have switched to UFS2 and the speed increased noticably. I will let you know when I transfer all of those GB of data :-) Yes it looks like the cause of the hangup is the swap rush/deadlock but I could not verify it as the machine was unresponsive. Still both machines use 1GB of RAM per VM so still 2GB should be free. With other applications running and the OS taking 1GB itself (what I have seen on some other posts) this may happen :-( Best regards :-) Tomek --=20 CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info