From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sat Jan 2 15:54:03 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A6AB4D48B6 for ; Sat, 2 Jan 2021 15:54:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from mx.catwhisker.org (mx.catwhisker.org [107.204.234.170]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D7RJp2BQKz4YY1 for ; Sat, 2 Jan 2021 15:54:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.16.1/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 102Frs5D086327; Sat, 2 Jan 2021 15:53:54 GMT (envelope-from david@albert.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 102FrskH086325; Sat, 2 Jan 2021 07:53:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from david) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2021 07:53:54 -0800 From: David Wolfskill To: Graham Perrin Cc: FreeBSD CURRENT Subject: Re: etcupdate, svnlite, documentation etc. following the transition of source to Git Message-ID: Reply-To: current@freebsd.org Mail-Followup-To: current@freebsd.org, Graham Perrin , FreeBSD CURRENT References: <87lfdctq83.wl-herbert@gojira.at> <87pn2nu3n8.wl-herbert@gojira.at> <1d6c0954-ca13-b3a0-3e82-c79df594e357@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="h9KRLD9xw7xh/Fon" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1d6c0954-ca13-b3a0-3e82-c79df594e357@gmail.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4D7RJp2BQKz4YY1 X-Spamd-Bar: ----- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.40 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[current@freebsd.org]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[107.204.234.170:from]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[david]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:107.204.234.170]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; REPLYTO_DOM_NEQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[catwhisker.org]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[107.204.234.170:from:127.0.2.255]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7018, ipnet:107.192.0.0/12, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-current] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2021 15:54:03 -0000 --h9KRLD9xw7xh/Fon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 02, 2021 at 03:43:04PM +0000, Graham Perrin wrote: > ... > >> In this context, is `cd /usr/src` still true? > > If you clone the repository to /usr/src instead of e.g. > > /usr/src/freebsd-current. >=20 > Thanks again. >=20 > I imagine that use cases will _eventually_ include trios of directories,= =20 > as siblings, for example: >=20 > /usr/src/doc /usr/src/freebsd-stable >=20 > /usr/src/ports Please see hier(7). The default (and expected) location of a given part of the tree (such as sources residing in /usr/src/ and ports in /usr/ports/) is based on their function, not on the mechanism used to update/maintain those files -- which is completely orthogonal to the location. > True: there's the tradition of /usr/ports As documented in hier(7). > however with all three things moved, or moving, to Git it seems (to me)= =20 > sensible to have the source files for ports at >=20 > /usr/src/ports >=20 > For consistency. A cohesive approach. > ... Not on any machine where I decide where things go. You're free to do that, but IMO, you're setting yourself up for toe-stubbing and confusion if you do. > .... Peace, david --=20 David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org My concern about US "election integrity" is about the attacks on that integrity from members of the party of Senator Hawley -- especially Trump. See https://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. --h9KRLD9xw7xh/Fon Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGTBAEBCgB9FiEE4owz2QxMJyaxAefyQLJg+bY2PckFAl/wlxJfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEUy OEMzM0Q5MEM0QzI3MjZCMTAxRTdGMjQwQjI2MEY5QjYzNjNEQzkACgkQQLJg+bY2 PclDRQgArBRMr3g29tt3sgNs7gpO++bQiwkJhG3YhI1NY0uC1rwr0hKUEzYebKUS 63J9YKauAsjkqkixU473hAjU0oYeWbVH0moSOJ0DphaZU+FcBHcd2sJxuqiDp8bq drCTbrMnlcF4WI/al+FdkRaDNEbnoTGwCZtDQZRp+M6LS8jYGF5TAtfUNurMarvv 2W+gxHtxcxVBSIJdnTmzL2LG68ULVElvwBFEUDjhY6aTRTi++xzFO+vJOJrpeDaS 85YpWWTPOwjm23ZXElGwL3oIJ3zHafOFus5J5elyLH1K0mjGWHcAlHtaNbKuWxTz uH7Ej0yythIJ03zGCHGwDihbPkTSxw== =64Tk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --h9KRLD9xw7xh/Fon--