Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 17:55:20 +0900 From: hosokawa@mt.cs.keio.ac.jp (HOSOKAWA Tatsumi) To: bde@zeta.org.au Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, hosokawa@mt.cs.keio.ac.jp Subject: Re: 2.2.1 Serious boot problem related to i586_copy* Message-ID: <199703270855.RAA28036@frig.mt.cs.keio.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 27 Mar 1997 16:45:49 %2B1100". <199703270545.QAA11880@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <199703270545.QAA11880@godzilla.zeta.org.au> bde@zeta.org.au writes: >> Try defining bcopyw and bcopy as bcopyb in syscons, and using pcvt. >> bcopyw is currently defined as bcopy. Undef'ing it won't work, since >> bcopyw() went away. There are some bcopy's that should probably be >> bcopyw's or bcopyb's. pcvt uses bcopyb in just one place for accessing >> character sets. Use vt driver -> OK. #define bcopyw bcopyb, #define bcopy bcopyb in syscons.c -> OK. Both modifications are efficacious. 2.2.1 works fine on this machine even if the 'flags' of npx0 is zero. -- HOSOKAWA, Tatsumi E-mail: hosokawa@mt.cs.keio.ac.jp WWW homepage: http://www.mt.cs.keio.ac.jp/person/hosokawa.html Department of Computer Science, Keio University, Yokohama, Japan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703270855.RAA28036>