From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 7 08:20:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A429816A401 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2007 08:20:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Greg.Hennessy@nviz.net) Received: from smtp.nildram.co.uk (smtp.nildram.co.uk [195.112.4.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B39413C474 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2007 08:20:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Greg.Hennessy@nviz.net) Received: from gw2.local.net (unknown [62.3.210.251]) by smtp.nildram.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80BC42B6BA2 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2007 08:20:32 +0000 (GMT) From: "Greg Hennessy" To: "'Kevin K.'" , "'LI Xin'" References: E1HD4Bj-000D25-00.msgs_for_me-mail-ru@f30.mail.ru <859855731.20070206155625@mail.ru> <002501c749f3$bb1a1dc0$314e5940$@ca> <45C885B3.3000508@delphij.net> <004601c749f5$8dd0b930$a9722b90$@ca> <005301c74a04$b8528990$28f79cb0$@ca> In-Reply-To: <005301c74a04$b8528990$28f79cb0$@ca> Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 08:20:15 -0000 Message-ID: <001301c74a90$cbef6b80$63ce4280$@Hennessy@nviz.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 thread-index: AcdJ9KHf8rjufhFQTL+X6PMPrV8H7wAAMh+wAAObXxAAIxq00A== Content-Language: en-gb Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: RE: PF & Windows Vista X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 08:20:35 -0000 > I'd like to know if anyone else has experienced something similar with > Vista and their firewall. I realize it may be something with Vista, but this > issue seems to be related with PF firewalls and Vista. > I have ran (and am running ) vista with CTCP enabled and disabled through PF just fine. Silly question, are all your tcp keep state rules establishing state on flags S/SA only ? What's the default block log all rule telling you regarding the connection ? Have you tcpdumped an incoming session from that system through both ingress and egress interfaces to see what's happening ? Greg