From owner-freebsd-bugs Sat Nov 17 14:40:17 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 783A237B43E for ; Sat, 17 Nov 2001 14:40:04 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) id fAHMe4a29277; Sat, 17 Nov 2001 14:40:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 14:40:04 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200111172240.fAHMe4a29277@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Subject: Re: conf/21695: ifconfig_XXX_aliasY in rc.conf; Y must be in sequential order Reply-To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR conf/21695; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav To: Ian Dowse Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: conf/21695: ifconfig_XXX_aliasY in rc.conf; Y must be in sequential order Date: 17 Nov 2001 23:35:23 +0100 Ian Dowse writes: > For aliases the order shouldn't be important - the problem with > sort(1) is that it is in /usr/bin, which may not be available at > the time the aliases are configured. Sorry, I misunderstood the bug report - I thought the issue here was ordering, but it's consecutivity. Please ignore me :) DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message