From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 22 11:14:52 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 992F5AB9 for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 11:14:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ateve@sohara.org) Received: from uk1rly2283.eechost.net (relay01a.mail.uk1.eechost.net [217.69.40.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A5EB8FC13 for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 11:14:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [31.186.37.179] (helo=rpi-1.marelmo.com) by uk1rly2283.eechost.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TbUkq-0004JR-QZ; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 11:15:36 +0000 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.marelmo.com) by rpi-1.marelmo.com with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TbUkn-0004c0-D2; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 11:15:33 +0000 Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 11:14:36 +0000 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsnap Message-Id: <20121122111436.dceed6709863eada1968b3c8@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <20121122104059.33dd4637.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <201211211959.qALJxa2u013758@mail.r-bonomi.com> <20121122104059.33dd4637.freebsd@edvax.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.2.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Auth-Info: 15567@permanet.ie (plain) Cc: Polytropon X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 11:14:52 -0000 On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 10:40:59 +0100 Polytropon wrote: > On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 21:44:40 +0000 (UTC), jb wrote: > > > This is not the same what portsnap(8) does: > > portsnap ... command ... > > This "command" word is non-executable by itself; it has a meaning only > > as a special word passed to portsnap command to tell it what to do > > internally, just a kind of special indicator to be used for conditional > > processing: if arg=fetch then do-fetch-routine > > else if arg=update then do-update-routine > > else .... > > That is _one_ possibility for interpretation. However, the > bare word "command" carries two, maybe three aspects. > 1st: the commander: _who_ provides the command? > 2nd: the command content: _what_ is to be done? > 3rd: the commanded one: _who_ will execute the command? I think it's past time +-------------------+ .:\:\:/:/:. | PLEASE DO NOT | :.:\:\:/:/:.: | FEED THE TROLLS | :=.' - - '.=: | | '=(\ 9 9 /)=' | Thank you, | ( (_) ) | Management | /`-vvv-'\ +-------------------+ / \ | | @@@ / /|,,,,,|\ \ | | @@@ /_// /^\ \\_\ @x@@x@ | | |/ WW( ( ) )WW \||||/ | | \| __\,,\ /,,/__ \||/ | | | (______Y______) /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\//\/\\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ ================================================================== -- Steve O'Hara-Smith