Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 13:20:57 -0500 From: Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> To: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca>, "freebsd-fs@freebsd.org" <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: crash: umount_nfs: Current Message-ID: <A29F641C-5F87-4C28-8D3A-2253253D2094@lerctr.org> In-Reply-To: <YTXPR01MB01890E5CFDB2C827F50B0991DD3F0@YTXPR01MB0189.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> References: <20170316024433.qiujcewz5bclbgq5@borg.lerctr.org> <YTXPR01MB0189ABA592F02FBB9FFC2C9DDD260@YTXPR01MB0189.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <A5DCCD5C-F6DE-4C54-A9A6-2A3729808E67@lerctr.org> <YTXPR01MB01890E5CFDB2C827F50B0991DD3F0@YTXPR01MB0189.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ok, I think I have a repro scenario. I just repro=E2=80=99d it without this patc= h.=20 I=E2=80=99ll apply it and try again. It takes about 2 days to get enough INACT data that the umount_nfs crashes. --=20 Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 17716 Limpia Crk, Round Rock, TX 78664-7281 =20 =20 On 3/22/17, 9:20 PM, "Rick Macklem" <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> wrote: Larry Rosenman wrote: =20 > Err, I=E2=80=99m at r315289=E2=80=A6. I think the attached patch (only very lightly tested by me) will fix th= is crash. If you have an easy way to test it, that would be appreciated, rick =20 =20
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?A29F641C-5F87-4C28-8D3A-2253253D2094>