Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 26 May 2001 09:58:31 +0200
From:      Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.demon.nl>
To:        lwh <lwh@fpsn.net>
Cc:        Donn Miller <dmmiller@cvzoom.net>, Jamil Taylor <jamil_taylor@pobox.com>, wyrdwulf@catskill.net, stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: digital camera
Message-ID:  <20010526095831.C14953@freebie.demon.nl>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0105252325570.52909-100000@PHOENIX.ZER0.NET>; from lwh@fpsn.net on Fri, May 25, 2001 at 11:29:29PM -0400
References:  <3B04FB72.E3D2815D@cvzoom.net> <Pine.BSF.4.33.0105252325570.52909-100000@PHOENIX.ZER0.NET>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 11:29:29PM -0400, lwh wrote:
> On Fri, 18 May 2001, Donn Miller wrote:
> 
> > Jamil Taylor wrote:
> > >
> > > I've got the Sony MVC-CD1000 digital camera. It writes to CDRs, so after I
> > > have finalized the CD, I simply mount it under FreeBSD. It works like a
> > > charm, and the media is dirt cheap.
> >
> > What about some models to avoid?  That would be interesting.  I'd say
> > Polaroid would be at the top of the list, followed by Kodak, and Fuji.
> > HP's look like they're the best buy for the money.
> >
> 
> My kodak DC280 was the singlemost suprisingly easy, well-running-under-freebsd
> hardware purchases I have ever made. I can't say anything for quality in
> photographical terms ,but in terms of OS support it was great.

The photographic quality in our experience is pretty good. The DC280 is
now replaced (it seems) by the DC3400 with almost identical specs.

-- 
|   / o / /  _  	 Arnhem, The Netherlands    	email: wilko@freebsd.org
|/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte	 Powered by FreeBSD/alpha 	http://www.freebsd.org 	

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010526095831.C14953>