From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 22 06:18:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA8E2EBB for ; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 06:18:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from feld.me (feld.me [66.170.3.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97E908FC12 for ; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 06:18:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; s=blargle; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=Db1lEFKkKIbuoMXyvpUCNsT0QBaICzulOAKUr5mlkdg=; b=bDZXxXoyqAGFglK4zHW7dArdtnZ8Il8jPs5zLu4pdHE5ehylA/BaRyNXIDy4w8uS1Tu5YjzHgcLQqg9Xl25kYte1uPkpK0FQjYTCrzeCpdI7/aUCdngBJrDncFAFpc2E; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org) by feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1TmIPD-0001zI-6f; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 00:17:57 -0600 Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4) with esmtpa id 1356157069-2688-2687/5/29; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 06:17:49 +0000 Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 00:17:48 -0600 From: Mark Felder To: Mikhail Kupchik Subject: Re: Dropbox on FreeBSD Message-Id: <20121222001748.7945cc0b@tech304> In-Reply-To: <50D49BFC.60304@prime-expert.com> References: <20121219080412.5396aeb6@scorpio> <874njimak6.fsf@Shanna.FStaals.net> <20121219092347.4cafd59d@scorpio> <20121221095424.7a92e245@tech304> <50D49BFC.60304@prime-expert.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SA-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1, KHOP_THREADED=-0.5 X-SA-Score: -1.5 Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 06:18:00 -0000 On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 19:27:24 +0200 Mikhail Kupchik wrote: > Maybe a FUSE filesystem, kind of "filtering layer" above real=20 > filesystem, can be used to track all changes in the large tree without=20 > consuming kernel resources for each subdirectory? We'll probably have to wait for FUSE to stabilize in FreeBSD first. I = tend to not trust much of anything that wants FUSE these days because of = the number of kernel panics it's caused. I know there's some significant = work in progress, though.