From owner-freebsd-current Thu Aug 23 19:40: 7 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-54.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.54]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1474237B401 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 19:40:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 866BD66E42; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 19:40:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 19:40:03 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Jim Bryant Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Message-ID: <20010823194003.C5214@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <3B857DB1.2050904@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tqI+Z3u+9OQ7kwn0" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3B857DB1.2050904@yahoo.com>; from kc5vdj@yahoo.com on Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 05:03:29PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --tqI+Z3u+9OQ7kwn0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 05:03:29PM -0500, Jim Bryant wrote: > Why is csh tcsh? >=20 > There are differences... >=20 > 4:52:48pm wahoo(6): cmp /bin/csh /bin/tcsh > 4:59:12pm wahoo(7): tcsh is the newer version of csh. Kris --tqI+Z3u+9OQ7kwn0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7hb6CWry0BWjoQKURAr6jAJ9WRSE4Dj0aR1HKwNGLb8JNXwtQUwCfd3lz Sww62LNmhHZCIH8hdOmrDgE= =laS3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tqI+Z3u+9OQ7kwn0-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message