Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2018 20:36:32 -0700 From: Yuri <yuri@freebsd.org> To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r479263 - in head/science: . namd namd/files Message-ID: <b2adb0ff-05d2-d27c-4801-e3d0fbd89a46@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <CAP7rwcgArBcggqfF=HZ_C=pBRCAWO6CgePsXpHMYbt4fy-KTRA@mail.gmail.com> References: <201809082328.w88NSLVF073775@repo.freebsd.org> <CAP7rwcgq5EpuEggex2vG369-0Cz4O9GbRPQNpbUUQ6VB15HH4Q@mail.gmail.com> <bf8482a4-65db-a501-1907-03e581bf8069@freebsd.org> <CAP7rwci_GspMmTNrU5y-e3i609%2BCOjwWtosT4_H2MFcYsqzb3Q@mail.gmail.com> <536e5c65-b195-f629-6778-1935dc422b58@freebsd.org> <CAP7rwcgArBcggqfF=HZ_C=pBRCAWO6CgePsXpHMYbt4fy-KTRA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9/8/18 8:06 PM, Adam Weinberger wrote: > A compromise that linimon suggested on IRC is to replace the do-fetch > with a message that gives the URL and instruction for downloading the > official source code tarball. Other ports do this, and then there's no > way that we're violating their license terms. > > I agree with you (and linimon on IRC) that removing the port entirely > is unnecessary at this time, but until you hear back and get > confirmation that pulling from their git repo is okay, please just add > in a new do-fetch with a message telling users how to download the > official tarball. You could even rename the current do-fetch to > maintainer-fetch or something. Ok, thanks. I was thinking and going to suggest the same. Will do this. Yuri
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b2adb0ff-05d2-d27c-4801-e3d0fbd89a46>