From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 15 19:58:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C0B116A41C; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 19:58:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.village.org (vc4-2-0-66.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53D2F43D48; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 19:58:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5FJtqdB027698; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 13:55:52 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 13:55:52 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20050615.135552.74722719.imp@bsdimp.com> To: maxim@macomnet.ru From: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: <20050615230844.G61956@mp2.macomnet.net> References: <20050614231344.F76340@mp2.macomnet.net> <20050615.002712.123500387.imp@bsdimp.com> <20050615230844.G61956@mp2.macomnet.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: brooks@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ed(4) broken? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 19:58:48 -0000 From: Maxim Konovalov Subject: Re: ed(4) broken? Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 23:14:52 +0400 (MSD) > On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, 00:27-0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > > In message: <20050614231344.F76340@mp2.macomnet.net> > > Maxim Konovalov writes: > > : Latest GENERIC in qemu produces > > : Jun 14 19:12:04 qemu6 kernel: ed_start(0xc12e5000) GONE > > : Jun 14 19:12:07 qemu6 kernel: ed0: NIC memory corrupt - invalid packet length 45 > > : No real hardware though. > > > > ed works for me on all the real hardware I have. Maybe you could give > > me more details. > > Something between 2005/06/10 00:00 UTC and 2005/06/11 00:00 UTC broke > qemu's ed(4). I'm still not sure it's not qemu problem. No > additional info so far, sorry. That's when the big, jumbo ifnet patch went in. I eyeballed the changes and can see nothing wrong by visual inspection. Warner