Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 13:55:52 -0600 (MDT) From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: maxim@macomnet.ru Cc: brooks@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ed(4) broken? Message-ID: <20050615.135552.74722719.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20050615230844.G61956@mp2.macomnet.net> References: <20050614231344.F76340@mp2.macomnet.net> <20050615.002712.123500387.imp@bsdimp.com> <20050615230844.G61956@mp2.macomnet.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru> Subject: Re: ed(4) broken? Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 23:14:52 +0400 (MSD) > On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, 00:27-0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > > In message: <20050614231344.F76340@mp2.macomnet.net> > > Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru> writes: > > : Latest GENERIC in qemu produces > > : Jun 14 19:12:04 qemu6 kernel: ed_start(0xc12e5000) GONE > > : Jun 14 19:12:07 qemu6 kernel: ed0: NIC memory corrupt - invalid packet length 45 > > : No real hardware though. > > > > ed works for me on all the real hardware I have. Maybe you could give > > me more details. > > Something between 2005/06/10 00:00 UTC and 2005/06/11 00:00 UTC broke > qemu's ed(4). I'm still not sure it's not qemu problem. No > additional info so far, sorry. That's when the big, jumbo ifnet patch went in. I eyeballed the changes and can see nothing wrong by visual inspection. Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050615.135552.74722719.imp>