From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue May  6 12:46:50 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DFFE37B401
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  6 May 2003 12:46:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACFF843F93
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  6 May 2003 12:46:49 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h46JkmLr058000;
	Tue, 6 May 2003 21:46:48 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
To: matt <matt@grogged.dyndns.org>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 06 May 2003 14:34:53 CDT."
             <20030506142601.O6424-100000@grogged.dyndns.org> 
Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 21:46:48 +0200
Message-ID: <57999.1052250408@critter.freebsd.dk>
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: gbde atttach on sparc64 = kernel panic 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 19:46:50 -0000

In message <20030506142601.O6424-100000@grogged.dyndns.org>, matt writes:
>
>Thanks, works great now!
>
>On a related note, the problem I had brought up weeks ago (gbde + ccd() +
>md() = corruption) seems to have dissapeared.  The same torture tests that
>were causing problems seem to be error-free now on sparc64 and x86 boxes,
>and a couple trial runs with other files seems to look like it should now as
>well.  In retrospect, given the traffic on the list regarding filesystem
>corruption issues, that problem may not have even been related to gbde.
>Hard to say I guess, but it's nice that it's working now.

Your report actually helped me find two issues in GBDE, so you had
hold of the long end of that rope :-)

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.