From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul 13 18:28:41 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4B8516A4CE
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 18:28:41 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46E4C43D41
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 18:28:41 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6DISWRD022139;
	Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:28:36 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
To: Barney Wolff <barney@databus.com>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 13 Jul 2004 14:23:51 EDT."
             <20040713182351.GA72492@pit.databus.com> 
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:28:32 +0200
Message-ID: <22138.1089743312@critter.freebsd.dk>
Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk
cc: Jason Dusek <jason-dusek@uiowa.edu>
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: CVSUP and 5.2.1 RELEASE 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 18:28:42 -0000

In message <20040713182351.GA72492@pit.databus.com>, Barney Wolff writes:
>On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 01:05:45PM -0500, Jason Dusek wrote:
>> 
>> I ran make world this morning. I ran make kernel as well, but the kernel is 
>> broken, so I kept my old kernel. Does this mean that I have a RELEASE 
>> kernel but a CURRENT world? Am I headed for trouble?
>
>To core:
>How many users do we have to sabotage with "make world" before it gets
>removed from the make targets?  Is it really that hard in the very rare
>case when "make buildworld && make installworld" is what's wanted to
>type exactly that?

And your argument here is that people are reciprocally less likely
to hose (or as it may be: not hose) their systems because the have
to type 27 characters more to do so ?

Come again...


-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.