From owner-freebsd-ports  Wed Mar 21 13: 7:34 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from privatecube.privatelabs.com (privatecube.privatelabs.com [63.114.185.254])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7766E37B71D; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 13:07:30 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from mi@misha.privatelabs.com)
Received: from misha.privatelabs.com (root@misha.plten [10.0.0.106])
	by privatecube.privatelabs.com (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id QAA02180;
	Wed, 21 Mar 2001 16:01:32 -0500
Received: (from mi@localhost)
	by misha.privatelabs.com (8.11.3/8.11.1) id f2LKfB161374;
	Wed, 21 Mar 2001 15:41:11 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from mi)
From: Mikhail Teterin <mi@misha.privatelabs.com>
Message-Id: <200103212041.f2LKfB161374@misha.privatelabs.com>
Subject: WITH_X11 vs. NO_X
To: ports@freebsd.org
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 15:41:10 -0500 (EST)
Cc: billf@freebsd.org, knu@freebsd.org, ve@sci.fi
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Which  of this  two flags  is "the  official" one?  AFAIK, the  NO_X was
recently added. Shouldn't there be a place somewhere with something like

	.ifndef NO_X
	WITH_X11=	YES
	.endif

or the other way around?

The ports that  use the WITH_X11 flag  are: graphics/aalib, graphics/gd,
graphics/ruby-gd, mail/fetchmail, security/ssh.

Thoughts?

	-mi

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message