From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jul 29 00:53:15 2010
Return-Path: <owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7E741065679
	for <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:53:15 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from joerg@britannica.bec.de)
Received: from www.sonnenberger.org (www.sonnenberger.org [92.79.50.50])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 939B68FC15
	for <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:53:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from britannica.bec.de (www.sonnenberger.org [192.168.1.10])
	by www.sonnenberger.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A6E26676C
	for <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 02:34:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by britannica.bec.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id D08841509E; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 02:34:29 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 02:34:29 +0200
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@britannica.bec.de>
To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20100729003429.GA6430@britannica.bec.de>
References: <201007290011.o6T0BE0l072516@svn.freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <201007290011.o6T0BE0l072516@svn.freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Subject: Re: svn commit: r210578 - head/usr.bin/grep
X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for &quot;
	user&quot; and &quot; projects&quot; \)" <svn-src-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all>,
	<mailto:svn-src-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-all>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-src-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-src-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all>,
	<mailto:svn-src-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:53:15 -0000

On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 12:11:14AM +0000, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
>   - Some improvements on the exiting code, like replacing memcpy with
>     strlcpy/strcpy

Why is this an improvement? At least for non-trivial sizes, it is quite
likely to be a regression. Especially using strlcpy as replacement for
memcpy+\0 is bogus.

Joerg