From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Oct 17 16:30:06 1995
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id QAA13307
          for ports-outgoing; Tue, 17 Oct 1995 16:30:06 -0700
Received: from precipice.shockwave.com (precipice.shockwave.com [171.69.108.33])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id QAA13302
          ; Tue, 17 Oct 1995 16:30:03 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by precipice.shockwave.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id QAA14487; Tue, 17 Oct 1995 16:29:26 -0700
Message-Id: <199510172329.QAA14487@precipice.shockwave.com>
To: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@freebsd.org>
cc: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami), ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: www category 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 17 Oct 1995 14:14:36 BST."
             <199510171314.OAA04465@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de> 
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 1995 16:29:26 -0700
From: Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com>
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

web or www work for me, I couldn't care less (actually, I don't like net-web,
because I think web tools belong in whatever this new directory is called).

Paul

(I'd really like to get someplace separate, as I've got ports of ashe,
 getstats, and some other logging utilities that all dove-tail nicely
 with our apache/cern httpd ports.)

Paul

  From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de>
  Subject: Re: www category 
  
  > or "net-web" or something?
  
  I previously (privately) suggested `web' to (pst?)
  
  Julian S