From owner-freebsd-arch Tue Feb 13 8:41:20 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from h132-197-97-45.gte.com (h132-197-97-45.gte.com [132.197.97.45]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B8CD37B491 for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 08:41:16 -0800 (PST) Received: (from ak03@localhost) by h132-197-97-45.gte.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f1DGfAq01720 for freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 11:41:10 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from ak03) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.6-3 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20010212175819.A9537@dragon.nuxi.com> Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 11:41:07 -0500 (EST) Organization: Verizon Laboratories Inc. From: "Alexander N. Kabaev" To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: Proposal on shared libs version values. Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I know this will sound silly, but if numbers in shared libraries file names mean nothing to the loader, why can't we just go back to using lib.so.. naming convention for libc? Jumping between versions (5xx -> 5) just does not seem right. ---------------------------------- E-Mail: Alexander N. Kabaev Date: 13-Feb-2001 Time: 11:37:05 ---------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message