From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jul 7 05:46:01 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ADF399477C for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 05:46:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 586381C88 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 05:46:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 5767499477B; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 05:46:01 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56DC5994779 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 05:46:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pd0-x22c.google.com (mail-pd0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22A1F1C87; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 05:46:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by pddu5 with SMTP id u5so31700114pdd.3; Mon, 06 Jul 2015 22:46:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:reply-to:subject:references:to:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=DpI7lPrH2lpoTpF0jDSUywG19G8tS7JIYX2Xpri2ovA=; b=zIoYwJ4llJtV9pRHYKwuuqeLrEEtp5j6XIpgUGfd6TLcmAxGauqYQ/4U6vXsMQltWf ssxYlRRAtHvjx1u1ujkYfKyndsw1y8WKOBgSPFDgE8XLGsrgfxA+xdsAXP8T7J5fuKTV pAqcoXmQnukAriaUP+EIq1xKL0dC0Mmxl6eqyAxH9IXsYrTTt06oJwD6EUenoNMIDFOk Hi+BZfBRINWSEyHeMak8kKwNmiEEh/+LJsUQaLHuTUzyLtwMGUFsaLmOpj/HqMgT1exL 4pK3TnWcwyyTvXapcqDZLH3Tac5wzMqX7dTCl3HR3FLwwwpDLFxW1NzplsnKx5AxGxjE +Oug== X-Received: by 10.68.135.136 with SMTP id ps8mr5330378pbb.78.1436247960545; Mon, 06 Jul 2015 22:46:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:44b8:31ae:7b01::2? (2001-44b8-31ae-7b01-0000-0000-0000-0002.static.ipv6.internode.on.net. [2001:44b8:31ae:7b01::2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id nv2sm12786251pdb.25.2015.07.06.22.45.58 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 06 Jul 2015 22:46:00 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Kubilay Kocak Reply-To: koobs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: mail/postfix default build options request: SASL References: <559B643F.3060409@calorieking.com> To: Gregory Orange , ohauer@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org From: Kubilay Kocak Message-ID: <559B6791.7050407@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 15:45:53 +1000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <559B643F.3060409@calorieking.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 05:46:01 -0000 On 7/07/2015 3:31 PM, Gregory Orange wrote: > Hi Olli and ports@, > > I don't know if this is a helpful forum to raise it, but I would like to > request that SASL be enabled in the default build options for > mail/postfix. I am attempting to use binary-only packages wherever > possible, and so far this is the first where I currently have to build > it myself. > > I would have thought SASL is in use across many Postfix installations, > but of course I could be wrong. I was tempted to try out > SMTP-after-IMAP, but since Postfix has the support, I think SASL is far > cleaner. > > Would any responders please include me in the CC? I am not subscribed to > the list. > > Thanks, > Greg. > If consensus can't be achieved or there is a good reason not to enable this by default, then postfix-sasl as a slave port may be a desirable alternative, which I believe has existed in the past. I'm generally: +1 on security related options enabled by default +1 on OPTIONS_DEFAULT matching upstream defaults -1 on OPTIONS_DEFAULT introducing large dependency sets ./koobs