Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 26 Jul 2012 15:18:16 +0100
From:      Jase Thew <jase@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD Ports <ports@freebsd.org>, Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com>, Oliver Fromme <olli@lurza.secnetix.de>, freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Question about new options framework (regression?)
Message-ID:  <501151A8.7000901@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120725225736.GD13771@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
References:  <20120725155932.GA13771@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <201207251709.q6PH9mpJ086314@lurza.secnetix.de> <CACdU%2Bf_RW6eWdW9sZsTDfx7bz7L54u5C6qj-e9cBy714WM6KQA@mail.gmail.com> <5010640B.6070107@FreeBSD.org> <20120725225736.GD13771@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigC93EE58BBBF2666E1900028A
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 25/07/2012 23:57, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:24:27PM +0200, Olli Hauer wrote:
>> On 2012-07-25 20:18, Scot Hetzel wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Oliver Fromme <olli@lurza.secnetix.=
de> wrote:
>>
>> The following diff will restore the old behavior so make.conf and comm=
and params have priority.
>> (Place the make.conf part after the OPTIONS_FILE_SET part)
>>
>> Until now I cannot see why the OPTIONS file should always win.
>>
>=20
> because the priority goes to global to specific and the most specific i=
s the
> options file.
>=20
> if most people want the options file to not have the final priority, wh=
y not,
> can others spread their opinion here?
>=20
> regards,
> Bapt
>=20

I can't see why it would be of benefit for saved options to override
anything passed to make (either env or as an arg), as one of the reasons
you're likely to be passing them is to override any saved settings in
the first place.

Please consider reverting back to the established and I daresay,
expected behaviour.

Regards,

Jase.

--=20
Jase Thew
jase@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD Ports Committer



--------------enigC93EE58BBBF2666E1900028A
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=VWgf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enigC93EE58BBBF2666E1900028A--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?501151A8.7000901>