From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 26 14:18:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15AD11065679; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 14:18:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jase@FreeBSD.org) Received: from svr06-mx.btshosting.co.uk (unknown [IPv6:2a01:4f8:121:2403:2::]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 972C38FC1A; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 14:18:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.65] (02ddfbd0.bb.sky.com [2.221.251.208]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by svr06-mx.btshosting.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 68AC081EDB; Thu, 26 Jul 2012 14:18:41 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <501151A8.7000901@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 15:18:16 +0100 From: Jase Thew Organization: The FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Baptiste Daroussin References: <20120725155932.GA13771@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <201207251709.q6PH9mpJ086314@lurza.secnetix.de> <5010640B.6070107@FreeBSD.org> <20120725225736.GD13771@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20120725225736.GD13771@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.3 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigC93EE58BBBF2666E1900028A" Cc: FreeBSD Ports , Scot Hetzel , Oliver Fromme , freebsd-ports Subject: Re: Question about new options framework (regression?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 14:18:43 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigC93EE58BBBF2666E1900028A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 25/07/2012 23:57, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:24:27PM +0200, Olli Hauer wrote: >> On 2012-07-25 20:18, Scot Hetzel wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Oliver Fromme wrote: >> >> The following diff will restore the old behavior so make.conf and comm= and params have priority. >> (Place the make.conf part after the OPTIONS_FILE_SET part) >> >> Until now I cannot see why the OPTIONS file should always win. >> >=20 > because the priority goes to global to specific and the most specific i= s the > options file. >=20 > if most people want the options file to not have the final priority, wh= y not, > can others spread their opinion here? >=20 > regards, > Bapt >=20 I can't see why it would be of benefit for saved options to override anything passed to make (either env or as an arg), as one of the reasons you're likely to be passing them is to override any saved settings in the first place. Please consider reverting back to the established and I daresay, expected behaviour. Regards, Jase. --=20 Jase Thew jase@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD Ports Committer --------------enigC93EE58BBBF2666E1900028A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQGcBAEBAgAGBQJQEVG7AAoJEKSEvNs+6vHrJM4MAIdS2RPul8VvtrCkWsDxxVfF xFUvZ1A8ji6hC4Btc294L2++0zN77DjQsSdsuMq0pEJ+tvqchGNiGByTXMDFQKLy 426oM3G+2yXLrtLW/mm2eIs4+yLcx0X6vzuqvTsrpghOltsdsuVNHHMxK5zNQaUF yW1loNwzBhIiXl2G20aa1prABMbjgabem+fO4t6rT0PyIIa3mmqGz8rRNGveSi1M y66L+R45jqvBDmRIk01uKGTsWv3XcaVxaZPWmwxn/o/V5At9OiTUAKWTJXut5v5b eCE/KyiX2ztU1n0VjJ0rIAzBZWq7tqx1AhNqZtgmMwcL/54nbzT/MDsa0Qlu7MEI svDEYgByMBrCRSPRj55iRLD1UuUijwl6Y+N/+qOParrluLJ53IsAPIFwh53IAcjQ +x5MdJmKlJsMko2i8le3PdmHs95a7BekbbAsl6OV7C/wV12EgkTRec8Qi11cxLhj J/FJ1L1GlP2+DrFWg6ix0BHHMZqs++t+b+84sLQRgw== =VWgf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigC93EE58BBBF2666E1900028A--