From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 13 05:34:41 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1171337B401 for ; Wed, 13 Aug 2003 05:34:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spider.deepcore.dk (cpe.atm2-0-56339.0x50c6aa0a.abnxx2.customer.tele.dk [80.198.170.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 951C643FAF for ; Wed, 13 Aug 2003 05:34:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sos@spider.deepcore.dk) Received: (from sos@localhost) by spider.deepcore.dk (8.12.9/8.12.9) id h7DCYcP6016276 for current@freebsd.org; Wed, 13 Aug 2003 14:34:38 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sos) From: Soeren Schmidt Message-Id: <200308131234.h7DCYcP6016276@spider.deepcore.dk> To: current@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 14:34:38 +0200 (CEST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL98b (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: if_xl borked in current!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 12:34:41 -0000 Upgraded laptop from 5.1 to -current was as usual a bad idea, this time the xl driver broke (and wi is still useless BTW) leaving me with no networks working :( CURRENT: xl0: <3Com 3c575C Fast Etherlink XL> port 0x1000-0x107f mem 0x88002000-0x8800207f,0x88002080-0x880020ff irq 11 at device 0.0 on cardbus1 xl0: reset didn't complete xl0: command never completed! xl0: command never completed! xl0: eeprom failed to come ready xl0: failed to read station address device_probe_and_attach: xl0 attach returned 6 cbb1: CardBus card activation failed 5.1-RELEASE xl0: <3Com 3c575C Fast Etherlink XL> port 0x1000-0x107f mem 0x88002000-0x8800207f,0x88002080-0x880020ff irq 11 at device 0.0 on cardbus1 xl0: Ethernet address: 00:50:04:5c:f4:6b miibus0: on xl0 tdkphy0: on miibus0 tdkphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto Ideas ? or better yet a patch for the messup ? -Søren