From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 9 22:00:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A98A816A41F for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 22:00:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Emanuel.strobl@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (imap.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F2B6643D5F for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 22:00:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Emanuel.strobl@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 09 Aug 2005 22:00:55 -0000 Received: from flb.schmalzbauer.de (EHLO cale.flintsbach.schmalzbauer.de) [62.245.232.135] by mail.gmx.net (mp017) with SMTP; 10 Aug 2005 00:00:55 +0200 X-Authenticated: #301138 From: Emanuel Strobl To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 00:00:43 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <200508092335.21889@harrymail> <20050809214748.GA45385@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> In-Reply-To: <20050809214748.GA45385@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> X-Birthday: Oct. 6th 1972 X-CelPhone: +49 (0) 173 9967781 X-Tel: +49 (0) 89 18947781 X-Country: Germany X-Address: Munich, 80686 X-OS: FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3999494.O1Stzz2vam"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200508100000.53489@harrymail> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: drvince@anonymnet.net, Jeremie Le Hen Subject: Re: nullfs fixed ? (was: More into /etc/rc.d/jail) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 22:00:58 -0000 --nextPart3999494.O1Stzz2vam Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Dienstag, 9. August 2005 23:47 CEST schrieb Jeremie Le Hen: > Hi Emmanuel, > > > And you don't suffer from a big disk performance degradation with > > that? If you don't have I/O load it doesn't matter but I need usual > > I/O performance so I give each jail its own partition (GPT > > partitions). But I think some good guys are looking for fixing the > > performance issue like they already solved the nullfs problem :) > > Thanks again for that! (Jeff?) > > Are you sure that nullfs has been fixed ? In this case, the warning > at the end of mount_nullfs(8) manpage should be removed. I haven't done my own benchmarks yet, but I'm quiet sure that was fixed=20 about two or three months ago in 6.0-current. At that time I was figuring=20 out how to avoid nullfs, but decided to keep using it, so I was conviced=20 that it's been solved ;) But I think Jeff can tell you more, if I don't mix up names again.... =2DHarry --nextPart3999494.O1Stzz2vam Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBC+SeVBylq0S4AzzwRAk5RAJwNzaE3dJbU4qIRJj/RFU1DyME7+ACeN5fs MvoevyyzhW4vIJGDnMM9mxI= =Q1Fj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3999494.O1Stzz2vam--