From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jan 12 14:51:52 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mail.rpi.edu (mail.rpi.edu [128.113.100.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECF7C14D32 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 14:51:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.acs.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by mail.rpi.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA64008; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 17:50:40 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 17:51:01 -0500 To: Robert Watson From: Garance A Drosihn Subject: Re: NO! Re: [PATCHES] Two fixes for lpd/lpc for review and test Cc: Alfred Perlstein , Andre Albsmeier , Warner Losh , current@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Back on December 27, 1999, Garance A Drosihn wrote: >At 8:55 AM -0500 12/24/99, Robert Watson wrote: >>For example, imagine that the user has a >>number of hard links to the file in question. > > Okay, here's my newer version of the code, which takes > into account multiple hard links, and also makes it so > the spooled data file is owned by daemon instead of the > user. This works fine. Has anyone had a chance to look at this? It does work for me, and I think it addressed all security concerns, so if no one else has any comments I'll send it in as an update to the original PR. (I hate to resend the whole patch in a second message to this list, but if anyone missed my earlier message then let me know and I'll send the patch to you to review). --- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@eclipse.acs.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or drosih@rpi.edu Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message