From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 30 13:51:46 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E62616A4B3; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 13:51:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pittgoth.com (14.zlnp1.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.149.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AEA243FF9; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 13:51:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (acs-24-154-239-120.zoominternet.net [24.154.239.120]) by pittgoth.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h8UKphvd098935; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:51:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:51:24 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes To: "Simon L. Nielsen" Message-Id: <20030930165124.2d93dcf3.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20030930204315.GA388@FreeBSD.org> References: <20030929105114.5d39d879.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <20030929190404.GL915@submonkey.net> <20030929151550.3fe57a38.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <20030930204315.GA388@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.3claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Ceri Davies cc: FreeBSD-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: RFC: internal/staff.sgml X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 20:51:46 -0000 On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 22:43:17 +0200 "Simon L. Nielsen" wrote: > On 2003.09.29 15:15:50 -0400, Tom Rhodes wrote: > > > [More observant readers will note that I'm not proposing anything better; > > > I'm just voicing a concern. Don't let that stop you ;-) ] > > > > Yes, I did notice that. :) > > > > While I did draft a patch up for this, I can revert all that work if > > a more novel idea came about. This is why I asked for comments before > > committing anything. :) > > Since nobody seems to have a real good idea for doing this, I really > think internal/staff.sgml is the best way forward at the moment. Thank you. > > I think it is much more important to get all the information up-to-date > and gathered at one place, compared to getting it "right". If somebody > comes up with a great way; well, that is what CVS is for :). We can actually get it "right" later. Or move it elsewhere later, for now I think having all the data in one place and duplication removed from others will do the trick. I'll let this ride for awhile longer, then I'll commit my WIP. -- Tom Rhodes