From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 1 01:30:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA3381065687 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2008 01:30:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnemmi@gmail.com) Received: from rn-out-0910.google.com (rn-out-0910.google.com [64.233.170.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75BA58FC12 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2008 01:30:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnemmi@gmail.com) Received: by rn-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id j71so119246rne.12 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2008 18:29:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=qxVBBdjAVEkE9+DHt+I2+yKOOlHiUZrO/cLbJEPl7LA=; b=Ri/V4E5vbz29+mOfPvLy3+2PfaDZAI4zFcGlUtGILUvwEpJKrmUBMl4z1t8Ix/I/Y2 p7+KuDOB4DHkjbxY28LLXHUBqVVjAMuBLjy08twpMwI7DGeiLyRuMlIbrpJ7p+sRWg7B WGoWeZ2Zf480Slp1Xi98VmMFR+0QQs6G2yqWA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=Ra0M3pml4jX3ayt0nQCbcYifEUPdFtZ4zLAdDfWVGKq7aYErvBzP4DkXnjN6fAmgwk IltQY2vZqgXnr9aR9aXYEUiVLkXc1bMD4Iv4jyXysiE2CYhVHoqQEAQUrx8hfhup9wkr fTBLdByJf2QamAU+CK2AEmXmuPJJvvDJBRm88= Received: by 10.90.33.5 with SMTP id g5mr8147778agg.115.1222823124421; Tue, 30 Sep 2008 18:05:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.51.19 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Sep 2008 18:05:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <19e9a5dc0809301805s5a83b594q19eceac5ac79906d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 03:05:24 +0200 From: "Gonzalo Nemmi" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <78fb9d960809301653o5cb09cefpf05eba0a9926b9fc@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <78fb9d960809291927n60358006w7ef845e7cb40ed93@mail.gmail.com> <78fb9d960809301653o5cb09cefpf05eba0a9926b9fc@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Would anybody port DragonFlyBSD's HAMMER fs to FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 01:30:01 -0000 On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 1:53 AM, lhmwzy wrote: > I think port HAMMER fs to FreeBSD is easier than any other fs like ZFS. > Would anybody do this? > I do not have the skill or I will do this.:) > links: http://www.dragonflybsd.org/hammer/index.shtml > http://www.dragonflybsd.org/hammer/hammer.pdf > I've been wanting to ask the same question since July 6, 2008 ... http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/kernel/2008-07/msg00015.html ... specially in the light of the all the effort that went (and goes on) on ZFS ... I, for once, don't care at all about ZFS, but would really like to see HAMMER ported over to FreeBSD (just as much as I'd like to see sysctl hw.sensors framework or so called framework... whereas it comes from Murenin's code or from code with a more "FreeBSD feel to it" .. or from a better implementation or solution or unameit). But I'm still too new to FreeBSD ... Would really like to see some resources redirected in HAMMER fs direction though ... -- Blessings Gonzalo Nemmi