From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Sat Jan 19 22:18:53 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ECFB1496579 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 22:18:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk) Received: from bs1.fjl.org.uk (bs1.fjl.org.uk [84.45.41.196]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "bs1.fjl.org.uk", Issuer "bs1.fjl.org.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D606171858 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 22:18:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk) Received: from [192.168.1.53] (host81-153-12-168.range81-153.btcentralplus.com [81.153.12.168]) (authenticated bits=0) by bs1.fjl.org.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x0JLuXK2093201 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 21:56:34 GMT (envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk) Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2019 21:56:30 +0000 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <9A01020A-7CC6-4893-A425-11A7BF736F4E@ultra-secure.de> References: <089e330d-2761-2440-3b7f-dd22e9088af5@gjunka.com> <9A01020A-7CC6-4893-A425-11A7BF736F4E@ultra-secure.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: The status of docker To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org From: Frank Leonhardt Message-ID: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: D606171858 X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of frank2@fjl.co.uk designates 84.45.41.196 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=frank2@fjl.co.uk X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.77 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.77)[-0.769,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:84.45.41.196]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.75)[-0.752,0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.28)[0.282,0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[196.41.45.84.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.6.2]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[bs1.fjl.org.uk]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[fjl.co.uk]; IP_SCORE(-0.02)[country: GB(-0.09)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:25577, ipnet:84.45.0.0/17, country:GB]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2019 22:18:53 -0000 On 19 January 2019 15:31:11 GMT, Rainer Duffner = wrote: > > >> Am 19=2E01=2E2019 um 15:24 schrieb Grzegorz Junka : >>=20 >> Has this project been completed and now only needs testing, or has it >been abandoned, or maybe the approach has changed and I am looking in a >wrong place? > > > > >AFAIK, it=E2=80=99s dead=2E > >Docker is a Linux-thing=2E > >Your best bet is to run Linux in bhyve=2E > IIRC there have been two projects to port docker=2E One was using jails fo= r containerisation, the other was doing it the Linux way somehow=2E Given t= he way Docker is used (for running downloaded preconfigured binary containe= rs) that it's not really a BSD ethos thing=2E Anyway, both Docker ports stopped=2E Docker is a moving target, and I thin= k that had a lot to do with it=2E As Duffner said - bhyve=2E It you're containerising BSD applications just= unpack a tarball into a jail=2E Unless you want K8S functionally=2E Last t= ime I looked there was nothing doing on that front=2E --=20 Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail=2E Please excuse my brevity=2E