From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 22 14:13:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 694EC16A41C for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 14:13:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 222B143D49 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 14:13:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D54060FD; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 16:13:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09F1260FA; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 16:13:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DD56933C70; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 16:13:46 +0200 (CEST) To: Emanuel Strobl References: <200506091423.39940@harrymail> <200506221554.41750@harrymail> <42B96E66.4040503@samsco.org> <200506221606.42862@harrymail> From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 16:13:46 +0200 In-Reply-To: <200506221606.42862@harrymail> (Emanuel Strobl's message of "Wed, 22 Jun 2005 16:06:30 +0200") Message-ID: <867jgm7a3p.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Tests: ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Learn: ham X-Spam-Score: -5.2/5.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on tim.des.no Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lapic@2k interrukts eating CPU cycles X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 14:13:52 -0000 Emanuel Strobl writes: > I've been running 5-current on that machine with "options APIC" for > a long time, back to when I had to include NO-MIXEDMODE to get it > working until I think Robert Watson gave me some patches. But I > never had lapic so I was wondering... NO_MIXEDMODE was a workaround for missing LAPIC support. The patches Robert gave you were probably the LAPIC code from -CURRENT backported to whichever 5.x you were running at the time. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no