From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Aug 28 15:27: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A5C637B43E for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 15:27:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id e7SMPck22857; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 15:25:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 15:25:38 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Jim Jagielski Cc: Steve Lewis , "James E. Pace" , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Scaling Apache? Message-ID: <20000828152538.F18862@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <20000828140247.A18862@fw.wintelcom.net> <200008282218.SAA09245@devsys.jaguNET.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: <200008282218.SAA09245@devsys.jaguNET.com>; from jim@jaguNET.com on Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 06:18:23PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Jim Jagielski [000828 15:18] wrote: > Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > > > Apache was never designed to be "the fastest" web server around. > > > We designed it with different groundrules. With 2.0, one major > > > design consideration _was_ performance, and 2.0 does in fact kick > > > some ass and allows preforking, process/thread and "pure thread" > > > operation, which is good to have. > > > > I'll believe it when I see it. > > > > http://apache-two-oh.covalent.net/ This doesn't seem to be under any considerable load. It's a good thing that they're trying this new method, but I'd like to see it deployed on something that shows its performance. Like say... slashdot. :) -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message