From owner-cvs-all Wed Jun 5 7:27:37 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BCFC37B400; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 07:27:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.3/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g55EQHCd050719; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 16:26:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" Cc: John Baldwin , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/defaults rc.conf In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 05 Jun 2002 08:47:55 +0930." <20020605084755.K91379@wantadilla.lemis.com> Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2002 16:26:17 +0200 Message-ID: <50718.1023287177@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20020605084755.K91379@wantadilla.lemis.com>, "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" writes: >>> ntpdate(8) may be deprecated in the mind of the ntpd(8) author but >>> the replacement functionality isn't the same yet. >> >> If ntpdate is going away soon, we need to experiement with the >> replacement now. > >What's the replacement? Ideally, somebody would sit down and write a sntpd(8), which would be a light-weight, client-side-only NTP daemon without refclock support, without weird remote-configration stuff and other excess luggage. If somebody wants to volounteer, I will happily provide detailed guidance on the timekeeping magic needed. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message