Date: Sat, 1 Jun 1996 12:04:00 -0400 (EDT) From: Peter Dufault <dufault@hda> To: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans) Cc: dufault@hda.zipnet.net, terry@lambert.org, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Breaking ffs - speed enhancement? Message-ID: <199606011604.MAA10264@hda> In-Reply-To: <199606011243.WAA17058@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from "Bruce Evans" at Jun 1, 96 10:43:46 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> It already permits agressive async behaviour, because update has > nothing to do with writing to disk. It just requires the update > marks (if any) to be converted to actual timestamps. I know - I meant "more aggressive" by not converting update marks to time stamps if you don't care. Maybe that is overkill, I thought the original application called for something like this. -- Peter Dufault Real-Time Machine Control and Simulation HD Associates, Inc. Voice: 508 433 6936 dufault@hda.com Fax: 508 433 5267
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199606011604.MAA10264>