From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Oct 12 17:42:52 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99103A11F53 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 17:42:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from white_knight@2ch.net) Received: from mail.nttec.com (mail.nttec.com [207.29.234.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 872DAE4D for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 17:42:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from white_knight@2ch.net) Received: from mail.nttec.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.nttec.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 42D6B14133C; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 10:32:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 01:32:52 +0800 From: White Knight To: Adrian Chadd Cc: freebsd-current Subject: Re: The kern.ipc.somaxconn limit revisited. Organization: 2ch.net In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <40010d0d47a24789523d90623b15da30@2ch.net> X-Sender: white_knight@2ch.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 17:42:52 -0000 On 2015-10-10 02:47, Adrian Chadd wrote: > I think it's worth upping to an int type, so we can eventually up it to > > 64k. > > Please do submit diffs for revie.w :) I'll work on the patch this week, thank you. -- White Knight I'm not from 2ch.net, I just work there.