Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 13 Jun 1995 05:54:04 +0200 (MET DST)
From:      J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de>
To:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG (FreeBSD-current users)
Subject:   Re: Which CTM# == 2.0.5R?
Message-ID:  <199506130354.FAA06318@uriah.heep.sax.de>
In-Reply-To: <199506122107.OAA02998@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> from "Rodney W. Grimes" at Jun 12, 95 02:07:45 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> 
> > It was just before you closed CTM for the tagging/merge after the release.
> > I'd say what all CTMers have is either -current (stopped around June, 1st) or
> > 2.0.5R if src-cur was made from the RELENG_2_0_5 branch and not from 
> > -current (which I doubt).
> 
> DO I HAVE TO YELL THIS, /usr/src on freefall WAS on the RELENG_2_0_5
> branch 2 days after I branched the thing!!!!

You do not have to yell this, Rod.  Calm down, and remember that not
everybody on this list is within a 10-minute-SMTP turnaround access.
Ollivier did only incidentally have the same thoughts as me.  (Btw.,
it has not been publically announced that freefall's /usr/src has been
up to RELENG_2_0_5, or I must have missed it when digging through my
mail pile after the vacation.  I'm pretty damned sure that there
hasn't been any announcement in ctm-announce, which is the CTM
announcement list for all CTM'ers, I think.)

And I _never_ offered public CVS access for anybody.  I've only been
referring to the fact that _I_ have the CVS available -- but that's
certainly no news for the most on this list (and I don't see any
reason why I would not allow to mention *this*).

Just to set this straight...

-- 
cheers, J"org

joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199506130354.FAA06318>