From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 9 04:35:33 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 375F3C1 for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 04:35:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from The.ie (The.ie [172.245.218.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "the.ie", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB744ED for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 04:35:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from The.ie (lrizzo@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by The.ie (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s494ZHuw094303 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 8 May 2014 21:35:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Lucius.Rizzo@The.ie) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=the.ie; s=signed-mail; t=1399610126; bh=cbOaRHfetewooW/ZpG3w2eJGUddBzhlxrHt/+xF9C+0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=I07oNe4KJScO8kQxa2hHmA7p0Qf7aCF+1irGBSuEvah050XSbUZ+/G7VBbOlRcj2L dxTRamfmJjydcfSsM2JlEI0u0stniWSPXinJag9JOu5Mbef5iXL8HV/EjgxlnaAy9q 2L+vUE8ma/vM5hmqPg2wKBavUjaYaw4bcDlb+UBdINdzw4Tr9iSCefWz6kybVJqL/8 z2NlsaTtHwntSM1XXpg0JKVyVe2jWn1nQKi3WVHNlANOyp8pAzeVZNviFASklWAIp+ p+pXBvEJIL7F+5kJ2IuMEDfmNbvXoPkOMrJCvni5USXjEAklnjxW4RdnFeKnl3U0J+ 5B+CVVt4EXnDQ== Received: (from lrizzo@localhost) by The.ie (8.14.8/8.14.8/Submit) id s494ZHK0094301; Thu, 8 May 2014 21:35:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Lucius.Rizzo@The.ie) X-Authentication-Warning: The.ie: lrizzo set sender to Lucius.Rizzo@The.ie using -f Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 21:35:17 -0700 From: Lucius Rizzo To: Brandon Allbery Subject: Re: Sendmail Version Message-ID: <20140509043517.GA94109@The.ie> References: <20140509025015.GA91549@The.ie> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Homepage: http://Lucius.Tel/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Abuse-Report-To: Please send any abuse of our services to abuse at The.ie. The.ie is a part of The.Marketing Inc. X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 on 172.245.218.25 Cc: freebsd-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 04:35:33 -0000 * Brandon Allbery [2014-05-09 00:22]: > On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Lucius Rizzo wrote: > > > 220 The.ie ESMTP Sendmail 8.14.8/8.14.7; Thu, 8 May 2014 19:46:51 -0700 > > (PDT) > > > > I thought it was the configs but I remade sendmail.cf and submit.cf on a > > 8.14.8 > > install. My mailer.conf seems correct as well. What is causing this? And > > what > > exactly is the difference between the first and second versions? And > > finally, > > how do I fix it :) > > > > It's not something you really need to fix; the configs only differ by that > version number --- the first is from the sendmail binary, the second is the > definition of the Z macro (DZ8.14.7) in sendmail.cf, from > /usr/share/sendmail/cf which was taken from an 8.14.7 installation and > didn't need to be updated for 8.14.8. I would imagine nobody saw any point > in a change to the base that did nothing but bump a version but required a > fair amount of change control / release engineering. > > If it really offends you, you can edit /usr/share/sendmail/cf/m4/version.m4 > to change it. I wouldn't bother. Oh perfect! Thank you. And no, lol, it didn't really offend as much as confuse me. I tried Freenode #sendmail but they aren't the most talkative bunch. That being said, I understand the challenges of updating files as it relates to release etc. That being said, maybe perhaps I should file a bug for it to be done. -- | _o _ |_)o_ _ _ |_|_|(_||_|_> | \|/_/_(_) - Lucius.Tel -------------------------------------- ++ QOTD: ++ ++ "I sprinkled some baking powder over a couple of potatoes, but it ++ ++ didn't work." ++